Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘iran-war’

Last June 17, 2026 Trump announced the US and Iran had agreed to a Memorandum of Agreement (MOU) and a ceasefire in the war. The global price of crude oil fell almost immediately—from the $100 per barrel range at which it hovered throughout April and May to $67 for West Texas Crude (WTI) and $70 for Brent crude.

The retail price of gasoline in the US—which had surged from $2.92/gallon nationwide for regular grade gas before the war to the $4.50/gallon range at its peak—cost the American consumer $69 billion in additional out of pocket expense for the four months, March through June.

The MOU did not last long. Within days it began collapsing and in early July both sides declared it was dead. Military attacks by both sides thereafter re-commenced and have escalated steadily ever since. So too has the price of gas at the pump again, as crude oil now exceeds $90/barrel and rising.

As the media story goes in the New York Times and Washington Post legacy media in America, Trump responded and agreed to an MOU as result of the pressure from US oil company CEOs who, in early June 2026, went public and warned Trump US oil stockpiles and reserves were running critically low and would disappear in another 3-4 weeks. That would send the spot price of crude well above $150/barrel and gas at the pump to $8/gallon or more! So Trump proposed the MOU to Iran mid-June. The tentative deal on June 17 immediately drove the price of crude down to $67/barrel and shaved 50 cents or more a gallon off the price of gasoline at the pump.

But is this narrative correct?

Was the Iran war really leading to US oil reserves collapsing, causing a severe shortage that was about to drive retail gasoline prices through the roof? Or was the MOU a deception and a tactic to set up a larger military conflict with Iran that is now unfolding?

Let’s look at some facts of the past five months about US crude oil stockpile reserves, US crude production, US crude oil exports and imports, as well as US refinery capacity and gasoline and distillate fuel inventories since February 28, 2026.

Official Data on Oil Reserves, Production & Exports

According to the sources US Energy Information Administration and the private economic research firm, tradingeconomics.com, US commercial oil stock reserves on February 27, 2026 amounted to 439 million barrels. In the first six weeks of military conflict from that date through April 17, US commercial stockpiles of crude rose to 465 million barrels. Thereafter a mild drawdown occurred and by July 17, 2026 the commercial reserves were still 411 million barrels. That latter number represented a mere 6% below the preceding five year average of commercial reserves. Hardly seems like a major commercial stockpile shortage. Or, for that matter, a shortage justifying a $1.50/gallon rise in the price at the pump and $69 billion cost to consumers!

OK. Maybe the commercial reserves were not at crisis levels but the Trump administration’s authorization of a release from the US Strategic Petroleum (SPR) reserve reflected a shortage offset by government oil supplies from the big SPR storage facilities in Big Hill and Bryan Mound, Louisiana.

At the start of the war, the SPR held 415 million barrels. That was already down from its 714 million barrel capacity due to the Biden administration’s release of 300 million barrels after its disastrous inflation and war policies. But that 300 million was all before the Iran war.

By April 17, 2026 the SPR had been drawn down by only 10 million barrels, to 405 million. The drawn down of the SPR didn’t begin until May. By June 26 the SPR reserve was 325 million barrels. Note this fact: the SPR draw down was in May to early June. That’s when the price of crude per barrel was hovering around $100 per barrel—bouncing around a few days lower as Trump falsely announced an end to the conflict no less than 14 times by various accounts—in order to prevent the price surging to more than $100. As Trump manipulated the markets with his announcements, the crude oil price fell $10 to $20 barrel each time, only to rise quickly again after a few days every time he manipulated the markets.

Since June 26 the SPR reserve has continued at around 320 million barrels. On July 17 it was 314 million, down from 325 nearly a month before. In other words, there was little further draw down of the SPR the past month, mid-June to mid-July. Just as there was little draw down from February 28 through April 17. The actual drawn down—about 100 million barrels—occurred between April 17 and June 17. As we’ll see the timing of that drawn down to the period between April 17 and June 17 is important.

The draw down coincided when the price of crude oil hovered consistently around $100 per barrel!

The SPR Oil Company Profit Scam

When the US government releases crude oil supply from the SPR it doesn’t charge the oil companies anything for the oil. They get the oil for free. No cost. They then can sell it for export at the then prevailing market price—i.e. $100 per barrel or more if April to June 17. Or, they can refine it and sell it in the US domestic market—again at the $4.50/gallon price instead of prior $2.92/gallon. In both cases there’s no costs of production for the drilling and other pre-refinery production. And if for export, no costs of production at all. Lower or no cost mean windfall profits.

In the first quarter of 2026 the 27 major US oil companies reported windfall profits of $40 billion. That was before the Iran war and the price escalation. Soon they’ll report second quarter 2026 profits. Analysts except that to be $60 to $80 billion additional profit windfall.

So the US big oil companies in just the first half will realize more than $100 billion further profit from the Iran war. While the US consumer puts out $69 billion and cuts other spending and/or his savings by that amount.

Who says war is not profitable! And who wants it to continue? And this is not to mention the Weapons companies of the Military Industrial Complex. Or the financial speculators who got pre-notice of Trump’s market price manipulation announcements—which include his friends and family businesses who placed speculative bets on oil price swings since February 2026!

The SPR oil company profits scam—where they wait to take SPR free oil at $0 dollar cost until it reaches $100 per barrel and more and then sell it at 100% profit—is just one of many ways that capitalists of various ilk have been exploiting the war.

Defenders of the SPR scam will argue the oil companies don’t realize 100% profit. They have to return the free oil from the SPR at a higher rate that they received. Typically they are required to return 1.2 barrels for every 1 barrel they take. True. But they can wait up to two years to replace the 1.2 barrels. So they wait until the price per barrel falls more than 20% in order to pump their own oil to send to the SPR.

This is not unlike ‘short selling’ stock market shares by speculators. In a short sale, the financial speculator capitalist takes possession of a share of stock and technically ‘sells’ it. When the price of the stock then collapses he ‘buys’ the stock at the much lower price. So he buys it low and (pre) sells it high. The difference is the speculative profit. He doesn’t actually take possession of anything. It’s all an accounting manipulation, except for the profit at the end which he gets to bank in his account. That’s real.

In similar fashion, the Oil company waits until the price per gallon is high, only then ‘takes’ the oil from the SPR. Sells it at the peak market price. Then waits until the price collapses and replaces the oil at the low market price. Even if the replacement is 1.2 to 1, the profit difference is when the lower replacement price is less than 20%. US oil companies took and sold SPR oil at $100 or more per barrel. They have two years to replace it at less than $80. The difference is pure profit. Should a recession occur within two years, the price per crude will certainly fall to $50 or less.

Other Evidence of No Oil Shortage

The oil companies in the meantime gouge the US consumer at the retail level for gasoline, home heating oil, and diesel.

If there was a true supply shortage, why has US crude oil production not changed at all during 2026 and the war?

From our same sources, on February 27, daily US crude oil production in the US was 13.7 million barrels. On April 17 13.6. On June 26, it was 13.8. Since June it has been steady at 13.8 million barrels. So the shortage is not due to US crude oil production. And, as we saw, not due to oil company commercial crude oil reserves.

So where has the SPR oil supply (100 million barrel draw down April-June) gone? Try US oil companies’ US oil exports. The dollar value of those exports rose from $7.8 billion for the month of February 2026 before the Iran war to $17.1 billion in April 2026 to $19.1 billion in May. (June is not yet available but almost certainly will exceed $22 billion).

An argument can thus be made the SPR release plus the US companies’ crude output increase has gone to exports. While some of the dollar value increase is no doubt due to the rising price of US crude exports, some of that is also due to the increase volume of crude exports.

And not just crude oil exports. Refined oil product exports have risen in quantity and price as well. US Refinery capacity rose from 89% in February 2026 to 96% in July.  That increase in refinery output should have increased the supply of gasoline, distillates, etc. and thus reduced the price for consumers at the pump but didn’t. (More supply means lower price).

Gasoline and distillate inventories fell slightly despite the US refinery production rise from 89% to 96% capacity.

According to the Wall St Journal of July 9, 2026, US gasoline inventories fell from 253 million barrels on February 27 to 212 million on July 9. And distillate inventories from 120 to 103 million barrels. In both cases, not much a decline or shortage from prior five year average levels, but certainly not enough of a supply shock to justify a 50% increase or more in the cost per gallon for gasoline and diesel fuel!

Conclusions:

The data for both US crude oil production and reserves (commercial or SPR) simply don’t indicate there’s been a crisis in oil supply shortage in the US.

US crude production and commercial reserves don’t support that view.

The US SPR release is actually a profits scam to enrich the oil companies, who will have realized windfall profits of more than $100 billion in just the first six months of 2026.

In contrast, US households have paid out of pocket $69 billion. US businesses more.

Much of the SPR free oil was likely re-exported by the US oil companies at significant profit.

US oil companies’ refinery output should have increased the supply of gasoline and distillates but didn’t. That moderate refined oil output increase was also likely mostly re-exported.

There is not now, nor has there been a supply shortage of either crude oil or refined oil products in the US. It’s all a Trump-Media-MIC misrepresentation of facts to justify a grand scale rip-off and exploitation—as all wars are.

Now that the Iran war has resumed as a hot war in July, the process of exploitation of consumers, oil price manipulation and speculation, and oil company profits windfalls will repeat in the second half of 2026.

Jack Rasmus

July 24, 2026

copyright 2026

Read Full Post »

by Dr. Jack Rasmus Copyright 2026

After threatening to destroy Iran’s civilization ‘for now and ever’, Trump announced a tentative ceasefire with Iran and temporary ceasefire of mutual hostilities for another two weeks. In the interim the parties—US and Iran (Israel notably excluded)—will reportedly attempt to negotiate a permanent agreement in negotiations to be held in Islamabad, Pakistan.

Trump and his supporters will no doubt declare the ceasefire represents a victory for the US. They’ll argue the military actions by the US the past six weeks has forced Iran to ask for negotiations and sue for peace. As Trump has bragged repeatedly in recent days, the US has destroyed the Iranian air force and navy so the war’s essentially over. He’ll cite that Iran has agreed to a ceasefire and in the meantime to open the straits of Hormuz to shipping.

The Iranians will say they did not request the ceasefire; Trump did. They’ll point out that the strait of Hormuz has been open to shipping all along—i.e. to those nations not at war with Iran as well as to Iran’s own shipping. More important, Iran will point out that their opening of the strait will be according to their rules, administered by them, and ships will have to pay a $2 million dollar transit fee for passage now.

The most important question, however, is whether the negotiations over the next two weeks represents a solution by Trump to provide an ‘offramp’ for the US from a war it realizes it can’t win without destroying the US and global economies—or whether it’s just another US negotiation deception and tactic to buy time to restore US and Israel military resources. 

The US and especially Israel need a respite from the conflict. The US has seriously depleted its store of Patriot, Thaad, Tomahawk and other missiles. It has begun losing aircraft as well. This past week independent observers have indicated that Israel’s vaunted ‘iron dome’ air defense has been seriously compromised and 80% of Iranian missiles have been penetrating it now.

Trump claims that Iran’s air force and navy have been destroyed, which ignores the indisputable fact that Iran’s missile force has been steadily destroying military and other sites on a daily basis in Israel as well as throughout the Gulf countries—Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE and Oman. Iran never had an air force to speak of; nor a major surface ship navy. But it did, and still does, have thousands of ballistic missiles, tens of thousands of drones, and a navy of fast boats, autonomous underwater drones, and sea mines not yet committed.

The next two weeks will tell if the ceasefire announced today is just another negotiations deception that seems to have become standard practice in Israeli—and now US—military operations. Last June 2025 Trump and the Israelis lured the Iranians into negotiations and then bombed Iran while talks were in progress. And then did it again on February 27-28 while negotiations were also underway.  Should the Iranians think it will be any different this third time?

Negotiations have become a military tactic in the Trump administration. They’ve been so by the Israelis for some time—along with decapitation of government leaders and mass bombing of civilian sites. The US military seems to have adopted the same under the Trump administration, quite contrary to American military doctrine for decades before.

But it’s standard practice for the Israelis. The Israelis scuttled the negotiations that were held with Hamas in Qatar. They likely also had a role in the still unresolved murder of Iran’s former president whose helicopters mysteriously exploded in mid air returning from a meeting in Azerbaijan a few years back.

 Positions of US and Iran on March 25

What Trump and the US legacy media won’t say or report about much is the actual terms of the ceasefire suspending hostilities the next two weeks.

So what have the two parties—US and Iran—actually agreed to as part of the ceasefire? What have they agreed to discuss in upcoming negotiations? What’s off the table compared with when the war began last February 28? Which party has perhaps retreated from its initial demands?

At four weeks into the war—i.e. two weeks ago on March 25—Trump and the US had five basic demands:

  • Regime change. The government had to go and Iran revolutionary guard dissolved
  • Iran had to end and dismantle its ballistic missile and drone programs
  • Iran had to turn over all its nuclear material—for civilian as well as military use
  • It had to abandon all support for allies in Yemen, Hezbollah, Hamas
  • And open the strait of Hormuz unconditionally to all shipping traffic

Iran’s demands two weeks ago at the time were:

  • All US forces had to leave the Gulf region and dismantle its 13 US bases there
  • The US must guarantee there will be no future hostilities or war again
  • The US must lift all sanctions on Iran
  • The US and Israel must provide reparations for the war damage they caused
  • War must end on all fronts—including resistance groups in the region
  • International recognition and guarantees of Iran’s sovereignty over Hormuz straits
  • No ceasefire until the US agreed to these demands in principle

It is interesting perhaps to compare these mutual demands to those of the US and Iran that are on the table now as part of the ceasefire announced today.

The US has a 15 point program. The foreign minister of Iran, Araghchi, on behalf of the Iran Supreme Council and Ayatollah, has made it clear negotiations would be based on both the US recent 15 point plan AND Iran’s current 10 point plan.

This 15 + 10 is the framework the parties will conduct negotiations.

Since the US legacy media will likely obfuscate the bases on which the US and Iran have agreed to negotiate, here’s the US 15 point plan announced on March 25. Note that it reflects a significant change from the US five demands above at the start of the war on February 28. In fact, it is very close to the position of the US on February 27 when the US and Israel blew up the negotiations with bombing:

US 15 Point Proposals Now

  1. US will remove all sanctions on Iran
  2. It will cease all threats to reimpose sanctions
  3. Iran’s nuclear program will be frozen under a defined framework
  4. US will assist Iran in developing a civilian nuclear project
  5. There will be limit on enriched uranium to remain under supervision
  6. US agrees to address the Iranian missile program at a later date
  7. Iran’s nuclear program will be restricted to civilian purposes only
  8. Iran will halt the development of existing nuclear facilities & capabilities
  9. Iran will discontinue further expansion of enrichment capabilities
  10. No production of weapons grade nuclear material to occur on Iranian soil
  11. Iran will hand over all enriched materials to the IAEA on an agreed timeline
  12. Iran’s Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow nuclear facilities will be taken out of use
  13. International monitoring and verification mechanisms
  14. Implementations will be gradual and tied to compliance
  15. Both sides to discuss additional regional and security issues

These 15 were apparently the demands being discussed on February 27 that third party facilitators at the negotiations, like Oman, declared that the parties had made great progress toward agreeing and were close to a deal. That was 24 hours before the US and Israel started bombing on the 28th.

Once the war started Trump substituted these 15 for the new demands of regime change, etc.

Now it appears Trump has put these 15 back on the table as the US basis for upcoming negotiations in Islamabad. Readers should notice the15 no longer include reference to regime change; or turning over ALL nuclear material including civilian; or dismantling Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programs; or abandoning Yemen, Hesbollah and Hamas!

In other words, we’re back primarily to discussing nuclear weapons issues—i.e. where the parties were before the last six weeks of escalating death and destruction.

What then are Iran’s ‘new’ proposals to be discussed in Pakistan?

Notably, Iran has also retreated. It has backed off its prior position of ‘no ceasefire’. It now agrees to a ceasefire—temporarily for two weeks. Iran has also dropped its prior proposal that the US must close and exit all its 13 military bases in the region. And US must pay reparations. Here’s the full, current list:

Iran’s Current 10 Point Proposal

  1. Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again
  2. Permanent end to the war, not just a ceasefire
  3. End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon
  4. Lifting of all sanctions on Iran
  5. End to all regional fighting against Iranian allies
  6. In return, Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz
  7. Iran will determine the rules of safe passage through Hormuz
  8. A Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship
  9. Iran would split these fees with Oman
  10. Iran to use Hormuz fees for reconstruction instead of reparations

So has Trump won a great victory by announcing a temporary ceasefire for two weeks and getting the Hormuz strait to open?

Hardly. There’s no ‘unconditional transit through the strait’. Iran (with Oman) now control the strait and require a fee for passage.

Is Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programs going to be dismantled? No. Even the US 15 point program says that’s off the table.

Sanctions will be lifted. That’s clearly a benefit to Iran.

Iran will likely agree to most of the US 15 points that addressed the question of nuclear materials and production. It was about to do so on February 27 if we believe Oman observers.  Iran doesn’t need nuclear weapons to defend itself any longer. Clearly, as recent events have shown, it can do so with ballistic missiles and drones. And dismantling its missiles and drones is not one of the US 15 point demands. In fact, US point six indicates it’s off the table.

And Iran gets reparations. It’s just that global shipping companies and Gulf countries will pay for that now via the $2m transit fee, instead of the US directly.

The two big obstacles to negotiating a final deal in Islamabad will be ceasing all hostilities against Iran allies in the region, including by Israel, and providing some kind of security guarantee for Iran a new war won’t break out again at a later date.

Trump and the US can agree all they want to not attack the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza. But Israel won’t be a signatory to any final agreement so it is not bound. It can, and will likely make public statements in the interim that it won’t resume attacks, but verbal assurances mean nothing to Isreal. Israel will resume attacks regardless of the negotiations outcome. Israel policy is land acquisition. And to do that it will continue to attack its neighbors. As evidence, as Trump announced the ceasefire, the same day the head of the Israeli Parliament publicly declared that Israel will formally annex south Lebanon up to the Litani river and make it part of Israel.

Economic Fallout of Ceasefire and Pending Negotiations

Immediately upon Trump’s ceasefire announcement, the price of gasoline at the pump in the US fell, as global crude prices retreated 17% from $113 to $97 a barrel. Falling as well was the price of the US dollar (i.e. devaluation) and market long term interest rates (10 & 30 year US Treasury bonds) in the US. Conversely, US stock markets surged clawing back some of the 10% losses incurred since the war began. Gold and Silver resumed their escalation ladder as well.

But regardless of the outcome of negotiations, long term economic effects will continue to undermine the US and global economies. The production of oil, natural gas, and other commodities in the Gulf region will continue to flow well below pre-war levels for some time. The seriously destroyed supply chains won’t repair for months to come and likely years. Money capital investments the Gulf economy elites had pledged to invest in the US economy will now slow to a trickle. There will be no ‘trillion dollar investment’ into the US economy that Trump has bragged about will boost US economic growth. Nor will US capital and investors rush as before to the Gulf region with their money to invest. Asian countries will look to backstop their energy from the Gulf with other sources long term. They know hostilities can erupt any time the US, and especially Israel, choose. They will reduce their dependencies on the region.

Domestically, the US real economy is going to experience a higher, sustained level of inflation for months to come. US interest rates by the Fed will not be cut now through this year and may even start to rise again. US real economic growth will slow even more than currently. The US budget deficit, already on track for $2 trillion again in 2026, may even exceed that, should the US Congress agree to the Secretary of War, Hegseth’s, request for $200 billion more to pay for the Iran war and prior Venezuela operation.

There will be geopolitical consequences of Trump’s war on Iran as well, regardless of whether negotiations result in a settlement two weeks hence.

The NATO alliance just received another nail in its coffin. Trump’s request, and EU NATO countries’ refusal to help US invade Iran may be the straw that broke the NATO camel’s back, as the saying goes.  US refusal to fund Ukraine, recent Greenland disputes, and now Iran likely constitute three body blows to that alliance.

Another geopolitical sea change is that the Gulf states will rethink their relationship to the US and its military bases. At least some of them. Most likely Qatar and Oman will distance from the US first. Maybe thereafter the Saudis.

Conversely, the US itself will have to think hard whether it’s a good strategic policy to maintain bases in the region, or to move them back further from the front lines easily attacked by Iran missiles and drones.

Not least, the cost of the Iran war ($200 billion at minimum so far) will push the US budget deficit into the red even further. It will result in Trump and the Republican controlled Congress now cutting social programs even further in order to help pay for the War, Hegseth’s $200 billion request, and Trump’s 2027 budget that calls for a 40%, $400 billion further increase in the Pentagon budget to $1.5 trillion next year.  Already Trump is preparing the ground, saying publicly the US federal government should not be ‘in the business’ of providing health care services for Americans. Its task is defense (aka more Trump wars).

Conclusions

So who’s winning, or has won, the Iran war thus far? Who’s losing?

Iran has agreed to a temporary ceasefire and to negotiate. But it will still run the Hormuz strait. It will collect fees. Higher global oil prices means it will make even more money from oil sales. That can buy a lot of Chinese radars and Russian anti-aircraft systems. The US will not control the Hormuz in any way. Iran will set the rules and control the strait, in cooperation with one or two friendlier Gulf states (Oman, maybe Qatar?)

Iran will replenish and accelerate production and development of its missiles and drone programs.

The Iran war—like the Ukraine war—means military power has changed radically. Surface ships are sitting ducks. Even 5th generation aircraft if they get too close. War is now about hypersonic missiles, autonomous weapons, massed drones in the air, on and under the water, low orbit satellites and surveillance—and of course economic destabilization.

The most important question remains: what will Israel do should US and Iran agree to a deal (or don’t)? Trump and the Iranians can agree to all they want. Israel will not necessarily abide by it (even if it says it will). When the dust settles, Israel will again try to find a way to lure America into its wars of expansion in the middle east. 

The question then becomes whether the US constitutional Republic can survive the influence of Israel and its US Zionist billionaire oligarchs’ stranglehold on the US political system itself.

Dr. Jack Rasmus

April 7, 2026

Read Full Post »

Two days ago I wrote an extended article, ‘Some Economic Consequences of the Iran War’ now posted on my blog, http://jackrasmus.com. It addressed ten areas of economic impact on the US and global economies. Now that Israel has just expanded the war by attacking Iran’s gas fields–and Iran has responded by counter-attacking UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia fields–the economic crisis from now further escalating crude and gas oil prices is now accelerating faster. Its impact on global stock markets, central bank interest rate hikes, currencies (including the $US) and global food supply is intensifying. Here are some of the indicators now beginning to worsen as the Iran war concludes its fourth week today, March 21:

Brent benchmark crude oil hit $112 at the start of the day, March 21, the highest since 2022. Natgas prices in Europe surged 35% in one day.

The oil shock is now hitting US and global stock markets harder. The S&P 500 is down for the 4th week in a row, as are Europe and other markets. Only the S&P energy index is up. Without that, the S&P would be collapsing.

After rising due to investors seeking a safety haven, the US dollar is now falling once again, down 0.9% this past week (after having fallen 10.2% in 2025. The declining dollar will contribute separately from oil prices to rising grain and commodity prices in general. A falling dollar will accelerate the global shift away from the US dollar as global reserve currency.

The US central bank, the Federal Reserve, stopped cutting rates this week and will now move to raising its policy (short term) rate if the war continues. Long term interest rates have begun to rise in the interim. The 10 yr. US Treasury bond rate is up for the third week in a row to 4.4%. The 2 yr note up to 3.9%. And US mortgage rates are rising sharply once again toward the 7% range. Other central banks–Bank of England, European Central Bank, etc.–are raising rates as well. The Bank of England’s bond rate is now 5%. Europe economies, now stagnating or experiencing mild recession, will enter general recession as result of record energy prices and rising interest rates.

The IAEA announces the current global energy crisis is now worse than that of 1973, impacting today now only oil and gas, but chemicals, pharmaceuticals, plastics and urea fertilizer prices world wide. Fuel rationing has already begun in several Asian countries. China has stopped exporting any energy products. Jet fuel cost is rising and airline prices are doubling and airlines cutting out more scheduled flights. Gasoline prices in the US are up $1 a gallon on average. Fertilizer prices have risen 40% and Asian fertilizer factories are shutting down. The UN says two more weeks of war and global food supplies become critical for grains, meat, dairy products and spring plantings.

Meanwhile, it appears US plans for an invasion of Iran (boots on the ground) are growing more likely, as US ships with 5 to 7,000 Marines approach the Iranian gulf coast. And Israel simultaneously releases indirect threats it my use a tactical nuclear weapon on Iran should Iran’s missiles continue to damage Israel airfields, Haifa oil refinery, and critical Israeli infrastructure as that country’s ‘Iron Dome’ missile defense system continues to fail.

These intensifying and escalating likely actions will accelerate the oil price shock and its economic impacts in the next several weeks. Business sources predict global crude oil prices will exceed $180 a barrel. At that price, global and US recession is inevitable.

For my recent March 20, 2026 TV interview on these and related political topics, watch at:

Dr. Jack Rasmus

March 21, 2026

Read Full Post »