Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘hormuz-strait’

Trump Announces Iran Ceasefire-US Offramp Or Just Another Deception

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged , , , , , , , , on April 8, 2026| 2 Comments »

by Dr. Jack Rasmus Copyright 2026

After threatening to destroy Iran’s civilization ‘for now and ever’, Trump announced a tentative ceasefire with Iran and temporary ceasefire of mutual hostilities for another two weeks. In the interim the parties—US and Iran (Israel notably excluded)—will reportedly attempt to negotiate a permanent agreement in negotiations to be held in Islamabad, Pakistan.

Trump and his supporters will no doubt declare the ceasefire represents a victory for the US. They’ll argue the military actions by the US the past six weeks has forced Iran to ask for negotiations and sue for peace. As Trump has bragged repeatedly in recent days, the US has destroyed the Iranian air force and navy so the war’s essentially over. He’ll cite that Iran has agreed to a ceasefire and in the meantime to open the straits of Hormuz to shipping.

The Iranians will say they did not request the ceasefire; Trump did. They’ll point out that the strait of Hormuz has been open to shipping all along—i.e. to those nations not at war with Iran as well as to Iran’s own shipping. More important, Iran will point out that their opening of the strait will be according to their rules, administered by them, and ships will have to pay a $2 million dollar transit fee for passage now.

The most important question, however, is whether the negotiations over the next two weeks represents a solution by Trump to provide an ‘offramp’ for the US from a war it realizes it can’t win without destroying the US and global economies—or whether it’s just another US negotiation deception and tactic to buy time to restore US and Israel military resources. 

The US and especially Israel need a respite from the conflict. The US has seriously depleted its store of Patriot, Thaad, Tomahawk and other missiles. It has begun losing aircraft as well. This past week independent observers have indicated that Israel’s vaunted ‘iron dome’ air defense has been seriously compromised and 80% of Iranian missiles have been penetrating it now.

Trump claims that Iran’s air force and navy have been destroyed, which ignores the indisputable fact that Iran’s missile force has been steadily destroying military and other sites on a daily basis in Israel as well as throughout the Gulf countries—Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE and Oman. Iran never had an air force to speak of; nor a major surface ship navy. But it did, and still does, have thousands of ballistic missiles, tens of thousands of drones, and a navy of fast boats, autonomous underwater drones, and sea mines not yet committed.

The next two weeks will tell if the ceasefire announced today is just another negotiations deception that seems to have become standard practice in Israeli—and now US—military operations. Last June 2025 Trump and the Israelis lured the Iranians into negotiations and then bombed Iran while talks were in progress. And then did it again on February 27-28 while negotiations were also underway.  Should the Iranians think it will be any different this third time?

Negotiations have become a military tactic in the Trump administration. They’ve been so by the Israelis for some time—along with decapitation of government leaders and mass bombing of civilian sites. The US military seems to have adopted the same under the Trump administration, quite contrary to American military doctrine for decades before.

But it’s standard practice for the Israelis. The Israelis scuttled the negotiations that were held with Hamas in Qatar. They likely also had a role in the still unresolved murder of Iran’s former president whose helicopters mysteriously exploded in mid air returning from a meeting in Azerbaijan a few years back.

 Positions of US and Iran on March 25

What Trump and the US legacy media won’t say or report about much is the actual terms of the ceasefire suspending hostilities the next two weeks.

So what have the two parties—US and Iran—actually agreed to as part of the ceasefire? What have they agreed to discuss in upcoming negotiations? What’s off the table compared with when the war began last February 28? Which party has perhaps retreated from its initial demands?

At four weeks into the war—i.e. two weeks ago on March 25—Trump and the US had five basic demands:

  • Regime change. The government had to go and Iran revolutionary guard dissolved
  • Iran had to end and dismantle its ballistic missile and drone programs
  • Iran had to turn over all its nuclear material—for civilian as well as military use
  • It had to abandon all support for allies in Yemen, Hezbollah, Hamas
  • And open the strait of Hormuz unconditionally to all shipping traffic

Iran’s demands two weeks ago at the time were:

  • All US forces had to leave the Gulf region and dismantle its 13 US bases there
  • The US must guarantee there will be no future hostilities or war again
  • The US must lift all sanctions on Iran
  • The US and Israel must provide reparations for the war damage they caused
  • War must end on all fronts—including resistance groups in the region
  • International recognition and guarantees of Iran’s sovereignty over Hormuz straits
  • No ceasefire until the US agreed to these demands in principle

It is interesting perhaps to compare these mutual demands to those of the US and Iran that are on the table now as part of the ceasefire announced today.

The US has a 15 point program. The foreign minister of Iran, Araghchi, on behalf of the Iran Supreme Council and Ayatollah, has made it clear negotiations would be based on both the US recent 15 point plan AND Iran’s current 10 point plan.

This 15 + 10 is the framework the parties will conduct negotiations.

Since the US legacy media will likely obfuscate the bases on which the US and Iran have agreed to negotiate, here’s the US 15 point plan announced on March 25. Note that it reflects a significant change from the US five demands above at the start of the war on February 28. In fact, it is very close to the position of the US on February 27 when the US and Israel blew up the negotiations with bombing:

US 15 Point Proposals Now

  1. US will remove all sanctions on Iran
  2. It will cease all threats to reimpose sanctions
  3. Iran’s nuclear program will be frozen under a defined framework
  4. US will assist Iran in developing a civilian nuclear project
  5. There will be limit on enriched uranium to remain under supervision
  6. US agrees to address the Iranian missile program at a later date
  7. Iran’s nuclear program will be restricted to civilian purposes only
  8. Iran will halt the development of existing nuclear facilities & capabilities
  9. Iran will discontinue further expansion of enrichment capabilities
  10. No production of weapons grade nuclear material to occur on Iranian soil
  11. Iran will hand over all enriched materials to the IAEA on an agreed timeline
  12. Iran’s Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow nuclear facilities will be taken out of use
  13. International monitoring and verification mechanisms
  14. Implementations will be gradual and tied to compliance
  15. Both sides to discuss additional regional and security issues

These 15 were apparently the demands being discussed on February 27 that third party facilitators at the negotiations, like Oman, declared that the parties had made great progress toward agreeing and were close to a deal. That was 24 hours before the US and Israel started bombing on the 28th.

Once the war started Trump substituted these 15 for the new demands of regime change, etc.

Now it appears Trump has put these 15 back on the table as the US basis for upcoming negotiations in Islamabad. Readers should notice the15 no longer include reference to regime change; or turning over ALL nuclear material including civilian; or dismantling Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programs; or abandoning Yemen, Hesbollah and Hamas!

In other words, we’re back primarily to discussing nuclear weapons issues—i.e. where the parties were before the last six weeks of escalating death and destruction.

What then are Iran’s ‘new’ proposals to be discussed in Pakistan?

Notably, Iran has also retreated. It has backed off its prior position of ‘no ceasefire’. It now agrees to a ceasefire—temporarily for two weeks. Iran has also dropped its prior proposal that the US must close and exit all its 13 military bases in the region. And US must pay reparations. Here’s the full, current list:

Iran’s Current 10 Point Proposal

  1. Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again
  2. Permanent end to the war, not just a ceasefire
  3. End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon
  4. Lifting of all sanctions on Iran
  5. End to all regional fighting against Iranian allies
  6. In return, Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz
  7. Iran will determine the rules of safe passage through Hormuz
  8. A Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship
  9. Iran would split these fees with Oman
  10. Iran to use Hormuz fees for reconstruction instead of reparations

So has Trump won a great victory by announcing a temporary ceasefire for two weeks and getting the Hormuz strait to open?

Hardly. There’s no ‘unconditional transit through the strait’. Iran (with Oman) now control the strait and require a fee for passage.

Is Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programs going to be dismantled? No. Even the US 15 point program says that’s off the table.

Sanctions will be lifted. That’s clearly a benefit to Iran.

Iran will likely agree to most of the US 15 points that addressed the question of nuclear materials and production. It was about to do so on February 27 if we believe Oman observers.  Iran doesn’t need nuclear weapons to defend itself any longer. Clearly, as recent events have shown, it can do so with ballistic missiles and drones. And dismantling its missiles and drones is not one of the US 15 point demands. In fact, US point six indicates it’s off the table.

And Iran gets reparations. It’s just that global shipping companies and Gulf countries will pay for that now via the $2m transit fee, instead of the US directly.

The two big obstacles to negotiating a final deal in Islamabad will be ceasing all hostilities against Iran allies in the region, including by Israel, and providing some kind of security guarantee for Iran a new war won’t break out again at a later date.

Trump and the US can agree all they want to not attack the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza. But Israel won’t be a signatory to any final agreement so it is not bound. It can, and will likely make public statements in the interim that it won’t resume attacks, but verbal assurances mean nothing to Isreal. Israel will resume attacks regardless of the negotiations outcome. Israel policy is land acquisition. And to do that it will continue to attack its neighbors. As evidence, as Trump announced the ceasefire, the same day the head of the Israeli Parliament publicly declared that Israel will formally annex south Lebanon up to the Litani river and make it part of Israel.

Economic Fallout of Ceasefire and Pending Negotiations

Immediately upon Trump’s ceasefire announcement, the price of gasoline at the pump in the US fell, as global crude prices retreated 17% from $113 to $97 a barrel. Falling as well was the price of the US dollar (i.e. devaluation) and market long term interest rates (10 & 30 year US Treasury bonds) in the US. Conversely, US stock markets surged clawing back some of the 10% losses incurred since the war began. Gold and Silver resumed their escalation ladder as well.

But regardless of the outcome of negotiations, long term economic effects will continue to undermine the US and global economies. The production of oil, natural gas, and other commodities in the Gulf region will continue to flow well below pre-war levels for some time. The seriously destroyed supply chains won’t repair for months to come and likely years. Money capital investments the Gulf economy elites had pledged to invest in the US economy will now slow to a trickle. There will be no ‘trillion dollar investment’ into the US economy that Trump has bragged about will boost US economic growth. Nor will US capital and investors rush as before to the Gulf region with their money to invest. Asian countries will look to backstop their energy from the Gulf with other sources long term. They know hostilities can erupt any time the US, and especially Israel, choose. They will reduce their dependencies on the region.

Domestically, the US real economy is going to experience a higher, sustained level of inflation for months to come. US interest rates by the Fed will not be cut now through this year and may even start to rise again. US real economic growth will slow even more than currently. The US budget deficit, already on track for $2 trillion again in 2026, may even exceed that, should the US Congress agree to the Secretary of War, Hegseth’s, request for $200 billion more to pay for the Iran war and prior Venezuela operation.

There will be geopolitical consequences of Trump’s war on Iran as well, regardless of whether negotiations result in a settlement two weeks hence.

The NATO alliance just received another nail in its coffin. Trump’s request, and EU NATO countries’ refusal to help US invade Iran may be the straw that broke the NATO camel’s back, as the saying goes.  US refusal to fund Ukraine, recent Greenland disputes, and now Iran likely constitute three body blows to that alliance.

Another geopolitical sea change is that the Gulf states will rethink their relationship to the US and its military bases. At least some of them. Most likely Qatar and Oman will distance from the US first. Maybe thereafter the Saudis.

Conversely, the US itself will have to think hard whether it’s a good strategic policy to maintain bases in the region, or to move them back further from the front lines easily attacked by Iran missiles and drones.

Not least, the cost of the Iran war ($200 billion at minimum so far) will push the US budget deficit into the red even further. It will result in Trump and the Republican controlled Congress now cutting social programs even further in order to help pay for the War, Hegseth’s $200 billion request, and Trump’s 2027 budget that calls for a 40%, $400 billion further increase in the Pentagon budget to $1.5 trillion next year.  Already Trump is preparing the ground, saying publicly the US federal government should not be ‘in the business’ of providing health care services for Americans. Its task is defense (aka more Trump wars).

Conclusions

So who’s winning, or has won, the Iran war thus far? Who’s losing?

Iran has agreed to a temporary ceasefire and to negotiate. But it will still run the Hormuz strait. It will collect fees. Higher global oil prices means it will make even more money from oil sales. That can buy a lot of Chinese radars and Russian anti-aircraft systems. The US will not control the Hormuz in any way. Iran will set the rules and control the strait, in cooperation with one or two friendlier Gulf states (Oman, maybe Qatar?)

Iran will replenish and accelerate production and development of its missiles and drone programs.

The Iran war—like the Ukraine war—means military power has changed radically. Surface ships are sitting ducks. Even 5th generation aircraft if they get too close. War is now about hypersonic missiles, autonomous weapons, massed drones in the air, on and under the water, low orbit satellites and surveillance—and of course economic destabilization.

The most important question remains: what will Israel do should US and Iran agree to a deal (or don’t)? Trump and the Iranians can agree to all they want. Israel will not necessarily abide by it (even if it says it will). When the dust settles, Israel will again try to find a way to lure America into its wars of expansion in the middle east. 

The question then becomes whether the US constitutional Republic can survive the influence of Israel and its US Zionist billionaire oligarchs’ stranglehold on the US political system itself.

Dr. Jack Rasmus

April 7, 2026

Read Full Post »

How Will the US Military Invade Iran

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged , , , , , , , , , on March 24, 2026| 3 Comments »

By Dr. Jack Rasmus

Copyright 2026

This past weekend, Trump threatened to escalate the War with Iran by destroying that country’s energy infrastructure starting, as he said, “with the big one”. The ‘big one’ was no doubt a veiled reference to Iran’s civilian nuclear plants.

Iran’s Natanz nuclear plant had been hit with a US missile a few days earlier as a warning. As he announced his plan to destroy all of Iran’s civilian nuclear infrastructure, Trump further declared Iran had 48 hours to capitulate before the US attack. The price of oil jumped and stock market futures began to fall within 24 hours of Trump’s threat.

Before the 48 hours were up, on Monday morning, March 23, an hour before the US stock markets opened, Trump announced Iran had approached him and asked for negotiations. Therefore he, Trump, was now suspending the attack on Iran for five more days, i.e. to the end of the current week.

The five day extension had nothing to do with negotiations, which Iran announced had never taken place. Trump made it up. The five day extension was yet another move by Trump administration officials to stabilize the US stock markets and the price of oil, both of which were set to spike. Within hours of announcing his five day suspension on Monday, US oil prices (WTI) fell $10 a barrel to $90 and stock markets opened higher after a string of declines last week. 

Since the war began on February 28, Trump and various administration officials have repeatedly said publicly that negotiations were occurring, were showing progress, or even that the war was about to ‘end soon’, as Trump himself declared. 

The pattern shows such false statements were, and remain, mostly about keeping financial markets from falling too fast and to prevent oil prices from rising too fast.

But there’s another explanation for Trump’s about face and his five day suspension of the US attack on Iran’s nuclear energy infrastructure.

That’s Trump’s buying time to get US military forces into the region in order to launch a ground assault into Iran, to coincide with his plan to bomb Iran’s nuclear and civilian energy infrastructure.

Here’s some facts why the five day suspension is really about buying time for much larger US military preparation.

The mainstream US media keeps reporting that a contingent of about 2,000 US marines are en route by sea on the US landing ship, US Tripoli, coming from Asia to the Persian Gulf. If we are to believe the media, the US intends to invade Iran with just a couple battalions of Marines.

The Marines plan to land in the Strait of Hormuz area. The US will somehow seize the strait and allow oil tankers to sail through it again. The media’s is also promoting the view that a second possible landing target is Iran’s Kharg Island, where 90% of Iran’s crude oil is refined and shipped. Kharg is close to the coast of Iran, well into the Persian Gulf’s upper end and closer to Kuwait than to the Hormuz strait. The media refers to Trump’s own social media posts where he mentions Kharg Island as a good target for the Marines. Israel’s number one mouthpiece in the US Senate, Lindsey Graham, gives daily press conferences during which he refers to taking Kharg Island as well.

But it’s all a deception.

In fact, the entire 2000 Marines on the US Tripoli may be a deception.

That raises the question: Is the US actually planning an invasion of Iran; and if so where if not Kharg Island or Hormuz?

Sending 2000 Marines to seize territory around Hormuz or Kharg Island is militarily a stupendous strategic blunder in waiting should it be undertaken. It’s hard to imagine any senior US military advisor recommending that.

First, how would 2000 Marines get through the Hormuz strait and sail up the Persian Gulf to assault Kharg Island? They would be sitting ducks all the way, presuming they could even get through the strait. Furthermore, could a mere 2000 hold Kharg if they were even able to land and seize it? Marine battalions don’t carry radars and anti-missile batteries in their inventories.  They would be massively attacked by missiles and extremely difficult to re-supply.

The same applies to the other islands in the Hormuz strait, like Bander Abbas. It takes only one Iranian missile to end the Tripoli and all its 2000 on board.

The fact that US officials, according to Trump and the media, publicly mention Kharg Island and the Hormuz strait as landing targets should be an indicator there’s no intention of occupying Kharg or other Islands in the strait. The US does not discuss in public its military objectives. Therefore they are almost certainly not the targets!

There’s growing evidence, however, that when the US invasion comes—and it is coming—the landing is likely to occur elsewhere the media or Trump is not mentioning. There’s currently a massive US military build up underway, blacked out by the media, involving more than just a Marine battalion. There’s a traditional US military forces mobilization being sent to the region, more like the build up that occurred in early 2003 before the Iraq war.

Two US Airborne divisions, the 82nd and the 101st, have been activated and are reportedly en route to the region. So too are two US Army Ranger battalions. Another US Marine brigade has left the US for the region but will take weeks to arrive. It will likely relieve the first Marine force arriving on Friday. That’s a combined military force of 20,000.

And it’s been reported by some former US military officers that they’ve been informed two traditional US Army divisions are being prepared to go as well. That’s another 50,000. Saudi Arabia and UAE have indicated they will join the coalition for an assault. That’s now a total force of more than 75,000 ground troops! No way they are going to land on Kharg or some other island in the strait.

The US media briefly indicated last week that US forces are leaving the big US base in Baghdad, Iraq and redeploying to northern Iraq’s Kurd region, which borders on northwest Iran. The US air force is redeploying air assets to Turkey’s big Incirlik NATO air base, a mere 40 minute flight from northwest Iran.

When the Iran war first began in late February, there was much talk about the Kurdish forces in northeast Iraq entering Iran. Azerbaijan was also indicated. It is well known Azerbaijan is closely allied with Israel’s Mossad. It was a flight back after visiting Azerbaijan some months ago that the former president of Iran was mysteriously killed as both his helicopters were blown up in the air.

In Iran’s northwest there are large populations of Kurds and Azeris. But after a short reporting by the media on the possibility of getting the Kurds to invade early in the war, all the talk about an invasion by these US-Israel ‘allies’ from the northwest went silent in the media.

The northeast Kurdish region is also where US based military formations formerly in Baghdad until last week are relocating. Is this perhaps where the two US airborne divisions and two Ranger battalions might be sent—i.e. instead of Kharg Island or Hormuz? Is a general ground invasion into Iran from planned from the northwest?

Possibly. Perhaps even likely.  Why? Because it is geographically not very far from Teheran, the capital of Iran.

From Kurdish Mosul in northeast Iraq, and from Astara in Azerbaijan’s southernmost tip next to Iran, it is less than 200 miles to Teheran in both cases. The Kurds and Azeris might  seize and hold much of the northwest region of Iran where sizable ethnic populations of Kurds and Azeris live. The combined forces of Kurds, Azeris, US Rangers, US airborne could together invade.  The two full US Army divisions then might land in Incirlik or Mosul in Kurdish Iraq and cross into Iran to provide heavy armor follow up support for the invasion.

Israel will not likely take part in the coalition invasion. It is too busy invading its near neighbors: Lebanon, Syria, Palestine (west bank), and GAZA.

This is not to say for certain that Northwest region of Iran and Teheran is the actual target for a US invasion. But it makes more sense militarily than sending insufficient US Marine battalions on ships into the Hormuz strait or deep into the Persian Gulf to Kharg Island. Or using US Ranger and Airborne divisions to land either in Hormuz or Kharg. And certainly not to mobilize two full armored Army divisions.

Trump’s war objective is to destroy the current government in Iran. The US objective has always been regime change. He does not want a negotiated compromise. His talk about negotiations is therefore a deception and a lie believed by only the most naïve or who get their information from the mainstream US media. For Trump and the US empire, negotiations are just a tactic and prelude to military action. The Iranians learned that twice, once last June 2025 and on February 27, 2025. So did the Venezuelans. So have the Russians in 2015, 2022, and, I would argue, since last August at Anchorage, Alaska.

So far the Trump goal of regime change in Iran has failed: The CIA engineered popular uprising this past January-February was ill-timed, launched too early, and put down by Iran completely. Nor has limited military action by the US and Israel thus far—i.e. naval blockade, bombings, decapitation strikes, etc. Trump has therefore decided on more massive, direct military invasion.

All indications are Trump has decided to roll the military invasion dice to try to bring the war to a conclusion sooner rather than later.  He can’t afford to wait until summer. The deteriorating US and global economy won’t allow it. Nor voters in the coming November elections.

The longer Iran can continue its missile war, the greater the threat to the US and western economies. It doesn’t need to ‘win’. Just not to lose for another three months. The economic impact will take its toll by then. Trump can try to talk down the markets and spot oil prices in order to obfuscate the economic impact of the war for a relatively short time further. But he knows he must escalate, beyond traditional regime change CIA methods and/or limited military action, to a direct military ground war. Or as they say, “boots on the ground.” And it looks increasingly like that’s his plan sometime next weekend, or soon after.  

Perhaps he should remember how ‘boots on the ground’ turned out the last time the US resorted to invasion and direct military action in 2001-03 in Afghanistan and Iraq! Someone should remind him the estimated $9 trillion dollars that it cost the US taxpayer, its effect on the US economy and the paltry results produced.

Perhaps he should keep in mind US defense expenditures in 2001 were only $396 billion, US GDP that year 4.1%, and the national debt $5.6 trillion costing $350 billion a year in interest payments?

And that a US land invasion war is happening on a US defense spending of $1.1 trillion (plus another $200 billion requested by Defense Secretary Hegseth and a further $400 billion by Trump himself), a US GDP of only 0.7% last quarter, and a national debt exceeding $39 trillion and costing $1.2 trillion in interest payments! The US Empire can no longer afford costly direct military conflicts and invasions. Those days are over.

Wars are always very expensive affairs. And land invasion wars are especially expensive. The US empire could not afford its last land invasions in 2001-03 that cost $9 trillion. Today it is in a far worse condition economically to afford yet another direct military land invasion in Iran.

The US economy has already entered early stages of recession in 2026. The only forces holding it up from a deeper contraction are Net Exports (mostly falling imports due to tariffs) and an AI investment bubble that cannot continue. Employment is now contracting and Inflation is beginning to surge along multiple fronts. Stagflation is now rearing its ugly head.

But Trump thinks it will all be over quick, as his neocon advisors and Zionist campaign contributors and lobbyist have no doubt assured him. And if it isn’t quick? Well, there’s always his plan to try to overturn the upcoming November elections to save himself.

So Buckle up! It’s 2003 déjà vu. But this time the economic—and political—consequences will prove far more disruptive and difficult to manage.

Read Full Post »