COMMENTARY: THE FOLLOWING ENTRY REPRESENTS A FORAY INTO COMMENTARY ON THE CURRENT GREEK DEBT CRISIS AND THE RISING DIRECT OPPOSITION IN THE STREETS OF GREECE TO EFFORTS BY BANKERS AND POLITICIANS TO MAKE THE GREEK PEOPLE PAY FOR THE CRISIS. PARALLELS BETWEEN GREECE TODAY, AND THE US AUSTERITY PROGRAM TO COME IN 2013 IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE NOVEMBER US ELECTIONS, ARE MADE
The crisis in Greece is not a ‘sovereign, or government, debt’ crisis. That’s the surface appearance of the problem. The below the surface struggle is about how bankers, bondholders and speculators–together with their politicians in government–can offload the cost of bad assets they created onto the shoulders of the Greek people. It’s about ‘who’s going to pay for the bad assets’.
The news coming out of Greece, reported in the western press, is that the big boys of northern Europe, US, and their hedge fund-banker buddies, are willing to ‘take a hair cut’ and lose 70% of the value of their existing bonds. But the real facts are that 70% reduction includes only 30% of the current bonds that have become ‘bad assets’. No mention is made in the press of the other 70% of bonds that are not required to take a loss.
The reported Greek debt is somewhere between $300-$400 billion. The current ‘loan’ in question is about $170 billion. But the real Greek total debt is likely around $600-$650 billion. That’s just about the total on hand for the European bailout fund. (Total bailout that will be needed for all of the Eurozone is likely around $4 trillion, this writer estimates, to cover not only Greece but Portugal (next up for another $200 billion), Spain, Italy (more than a $trillion), as well as other ‘lesser economies’ also increasingly in trouble, such as Hungary, Austria, Belgium, and soon perhaps even economic stalwarts like Norway, whose housing bubble is now about to burst.
In other words, the Greece and overall Eurozone debt crisis is far from over and has a long course yet to run. That means little Greece’s problems are also far from over as well. As they say, ‘you ain’t seen nothing yet’.
If you want to see what a bona fide economic depression in the 21st century looks like, look at Greece. One out of two youth unemployed. General unemployment in excess of 25% (the worst year level in the US in the 1930s). GDP collapsing. Pensions shrinking. Jobs melting away at an increasing rate. And the bondholders-bankers behind the Germany-French and other Euro governments want the Greek people to pay for something they didn’t create. They want the people to cover the lion’s share burden of making up for their bad assets.
Greece is also a good example how an economy cannot ‘austerity its way to recovery’. Cutting incomes of those whose spending make up the overwhelming majority of the economy is not a path to recovery–as Obama and Congress will soon find out in 2013. Already the $2.2 trillion US deficit cuts mandated in 2011, which are scheduled to take effect AFTER the upcoming November 2012 national elections, will slow the US economy to a less than 1% GDP growth. Those aren’t my numbers; they’re the cautious Congressional Budget Office’s numbers. And that less than 1% growth is BEFORE Congress and the next president (doesn’t matter who) set to work cutting another $4 trillion immediately after the elections. That’s when the real US deficit cutting crunch will start–and the next double dip of the US economy.
Obama and Congress will discover what an ‘austerity recession’ is, come 2013. In that they will join Japan and most of western Europe, including the French and the British. Austerity, or deficit-budget cutting, only makes a debt crisis worse. Dont’ believe me, ask the Greeks!
There are only two ways to get out of deep debt-driven economic contraction that remains ‘systemically fragile’ today across the board. I’m talking about both the US and the Eurozone, as well as Japan. One way is to reflate the economy by generating inflation. The other is to liquidate the bad assets.
The Federal Reserve has done a horrible job at reflating the economy. The trillions it has spent on bailing out the banks, printing money, buying banks and mortgage lenders’ bad subprime loans at near full purchase price instead of the real 15 cents on the dollar they are worth, has led not to inflation in product prices (that would stimulate investment) but instead resulted in the Federal Reserve spoon-feeding speculators around the globe. The Fed has pumped up stock markets, real estate, currency speculation and volatility, oil and commodity prices, and financial securities in general. The money and credit from the Fed has not gotten to those parts of the economy that need it most. The Fed is not broke. It can always print money. It’s just that Fed policy is itself broken.
The other option is to ‘liquidate’ the bad assets. That too the Fed and the Obama administration have sadly failed at. The essence of the Fed-Obama bank bailout strategy since 2009 has been to ‘rescue’ the banks–not by removing the bad assets from their balance sheets but just by pumping liquidity into these zombie institutions (many of which have been technically insolvent and bankrupt now for years), to in effect ‘offset’ the bad assets on their balance sheets. The bad assets are still there. The Fed and Congress have not only just ‘offset’ the bad assets on the private balance sheet, but have in so doing mirrored those bad assets on the public balance sheet side. So it not only failed to remove (liquidate) the bad assets; it doubled them. Now the public sector has become as ‘fragile’ as the banking sector. But liquidation, you see, is abhorred by the bankers and bondholders. They don’t want their asset values ‘reduced’ or expunged. They want the people to pay for the losses. And that, once again, is Greece today–and the USA come 2013 and beyond.
Jack Rasmus
For an ‘Alternative Program for Economic Recovery’ that makes bankers and bondholder-speculators pay for the losses on their bad assets, see Jack’s program by the same title on his website, http://www.kyklosproductions.com, accessible from the right side of this blog page.
I just read an article by Marshall Auerback and another by Paul Krugman. The world’s assets are held by a minority, and the democratic majority are still unwilling to liquidate the insolvent banks, as they should be liquidated, nor will the majority insist on the correct reflation which would involve public job creation and the use of Functional Finance. Credit Suisse Bank’s World Wealth Report, 2011, says 0.5% of adults own 38.5% of all wealth, and 8.9% own 82.5%. There seems to be a vacuum for democratic solutions to the “bad wealth” problem. Auerback’s article had a comment that the Greek police union issued a statement they would arrest IMF bankers if the bankers entered Greece. This is a snippet from the article: “The VAT rate for food and drink rose from 13pc to 23pc in September to comply with EU-IMF Troika demands. The revenue effect has been overwhelmed by the contraction of the economy.
Overall tax receipts fell 7pc year-on-year.” But hey, the tax was theoretically correct, too bad it didn’t work out in the actual economy. Shock Doctrine response to crisis.
Auerback’s article, Greece and the Rape by the Rentiers is at Naked Capitalism. Good comments. Krugman’s at Truthout.
Perhaps the problem in Greece could be resolved if they were willing to sell off some of their objects of antiquity?
The Parthenon itself should bring in a few hundred billion euros, for instance, and you can bet that there is an individual, or group of them (I get confused now that corporations have some of the same acquistion rights as actual people do) who can afford to buy it, dismantle it, and set it up on their own private island or estate somewhere on the planet.
How about if Italy sold the Colosseum?
What do these bankers want, after all, except those things which are completely scarce to all but them, when the things that are most scarce to them should matter the most?
Money will never buy happiness.
Money is a construct – an invention – of corrupt human minds that wished only to control others in times of scarcity.
It isn’t something new.
It has been with us for more than 10,000 years, when people adapted to their environments and found it easier to be gathers, and hunter-gatherers, rather than always hunters.
They lived longer, even during times of scarcity, but they developed different social skills to survive those times.
Greed was one of them, unfortunately.
It hasn’t left us, no matter how advanced our technology has become.
Perhaps it is long past time that we worried about such things as scarcity when we have the ability to feed the population of the world many times over, from a technical standpoint.
We have the ability to house and clothe everyone who needs it as well.
We all live on a single planet.
This is our reality today.
The resources of the planet belong to everyone on it.
This is fair.
It is quite unreasonable in this modern day and age to even consider that someone might be hoarding those resources in order that so many others go without the basic necessities of living; and yet, that is what we have today.
I have heard that every second of every day a person dies for lack of the basic necessities of clean air, water and food.
Whole cities and towns of human beings being wiped out every single day.
Amazing.
And yet this is easier to believe than the idea that anyone should bend their knees to greedy bankers.
Sell the Parthenon and everything else you have to these people.
Those things don’t matter, and they won’t likely gain much value in the next couple thousand years either.
Give them what they want.
Don’t ever give them what they need, though.
Keep your spirits free, lift your heads high, and tell them you will NOT be bought.
Period.