A new form of colonialism is emerging in Europe. Not colonialism imposed by military conquest and occupation, as in the 19th century. Not even the more efficient form of economic colonialism pioneered by the U.S. in the post-1945 period, where the costs of direct administration and military occupation were replaced with compliant local elites allowed to share in the wealth extracted in exchange for being allowed to rule on behalf of the colonizers.
In the 21st century, it is “colonialism by means of financial asset transfer.” It is colony wealth extraction by colonizing country managers, assigned to directly administer the processes in the colony by which financial assets are to be transferred. This new form of colonialism by direct management plus financial wealth transfer is now emerging in Greece and Ukraine.
Behind the appearance of the recent Greek debt deal is the reality of European bankers and their institutions — the European Commission, European Central Bank, IMF, and European Stability Mechanism (ESM) — who will soon assume direct management of the operation of the economy, according to the Memorandum of Understanding, MoU, signed August 14, 2015, by Greece and the Troika. The MoU spells out direct management in various ways. In the case of Ukraine, it is even more direct. U.S. and European shadow bankers were installed by U.S.-Europe last December 2014 as Ukraine’s finance and economic ministers. They have been directly managing Ukraine’s economy on a day to day basis ever since.
The new colonialism as financial asset transfer takes several practical forms: as wealth transfer in the form of interest payments on ever rising debt, in firesales of government assets sold directly to the colonizer’s investors and bankers, and in the de facto takeover the colony’s banking system and bank assets in order to transfer wealth to shareholders of the colonizing country’s private bankers and investors.
The Case of Greece
The recent third debt deal signed August 14, 2015, between Greece and the Troika of European economic institutions adds another $98 billion to Greece’s debt, raising Greece’s total debt to more than $400 billion. Nearly all the $98 billion is earmarked for debt payments and to recapitalize the Greek banks. Wealth is extracted in the form of Greeks producing more, or cutting spending and raising taxes more, in order to create what’s called a primary surplus from which interest and principal is to be paid.
The Greeks aren’t going to have their goods produced and sold cheaper to Germany to re-export at higher price and profit — i.e. 19th century colonialism. Multinational corporations aren’t going to relocate to Greece so they can pay cheaper wages, lower costs, and then re-export to the rest of the world for profit — i.e. U.S. late 20th century colonialism. The Greeks are going to work harder and for less in order to generate a surplus that will return to the Troika institutions in the form of interest payments on the ever-rising debt they owe. The Troika are the intermediaries, the debt collectors, the State-Agency representatives of bankers and investors on behalf of whom they collect the debt payments. They are supra-state bodies and the new agents of financial wealth extraction and transfer.
The Greek-Troika MoU defines in detail the direct management as well as what and how the wealth will be extracted and transferred. The MoU begins by stating explicitly that no legislation or other action, however minor, by Greece’s political institutions can be taken without prior approval of the Troika. The Troika thus has veto power over virtually all policy measures in Greece, all legislative or executive agency decisions, and by all levels of government.
Furthermore, Greece will no longer have a fiscal policy. The Troika will define the budget. It will oversee the writing of a budget. The MoU calls for a total restructuring of Greek taxes and spending that must occur in the new budget. Greece gets to write its budget, but only if that budget is the budget the Troika wants. And Troika representatives will monitor compliance to ensure that Greece adheres to the Troika’s budget. Every Greek agency and every Greek Parliament legislative committee will thus have its ‘Troika Commissar’ looking over its shoulder on an almost daily basis.
The MoU states the Troika also has the power to appoint “independent consultants” to the Boards of Greeks banks. Many old bank board members will be removed. Troika appointees will now manage the Greek banks on a day to day basis, in other words. Greek bank subsidiaries and branches outside Greece will be “privatized,” i.e. sold off to other Euro banks. The Greek banks are thus now Greek in name only. They will become appendages and de facto subsidiaries of northern Euro banks working behind the veil of the Troika and at the shoulder of their Greek banker counterparts.The several tens of billions of dollars allocated to recapitalize the Greek banks will reside in Luxembourg banks, not in Greece. Greece no longer has a monetary policy; the Troika has.
The World Bank will redesign the Greek welfare system and a new social safety net system. New appointees to run the Labor Ministry, after approved by the Troika, will “rationalize the education system” (i.e. teacher layoffs and wage cuts). The new, Troika vetted Labor Minister will implement the proposals of Troika “independent consultants” to limit “industrial actions” (i.e. strikes) and collective bargaining and will, following consultants’ recommendations, institute new rules for collective dismissals (i.e. mass layoffs). Pensions will be cut, retirement ages raised, workers’ health care contributions increased, Local governments made more efficient (layoffs, wage cuts), and the entire legal system overhauled.
The $50 billion Privatization of Greek Government Assets Fund will remain in Greece. However, it will operate “under the supervision of the relevant European institutions,” according to the MOU. The Troika will decide what is to be privatized and sold at what (firesale) price to which of its favored investors. In the meantime, privatization sales in progress or identified will be accelerated.
The Case of Ukraine
In Ukraine’s case, only once U.S. and Euro bankers were installed as Ministers of Finance and Economics last December 2014, were more loans promised to Ukraine. The U.S. and EU put in another $4 billion in January, and the IMF quickly announced the new $40 billion deal in February. After the $40 billion, Ukraine’s debt rose from $12 billion in 2007 to $100 billion in 2015. The new $100 billion debt will mean a massive increase in financial wealth extraction in the form of interest payments on that $100 billion.
Another form of transfer will occur in the accelerating of privatizations. No fewer than 342 former government enterprise companies are slated for sale in 2015, including power plants, mines, 13 ports, and even farms. The sales will likely occur at firesale prices, benefiting U.S. and European “friends” of the new US and European ministers. So too will the sale of Ukraine private companies approved by the new Ministers. One of every five are technically bankrupt and unable to refinance $10 billion in corporate junk bond debt. Many will default, the best scooped up by U.S. and EU shadow bankers and multinational corporations. What both Greece and Ukraine represent is the development of new more direct management of wealth extraction, and the transfer of that wealth in the form of financial assets. In past government debt bailouts, the IMF and other institutions set parameters for what the bailed out country must do. But the country was left to carry out the plan. No longer. It’s now direct management to ensure the colony does not balk or delay on the transfer of financial assets enabled by ever rising debt.
This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address:
“http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/The-New-Colonialism-Greece-and-Ukraine-20150829-0012.html”. If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to the original article. http://www.teleSURtv.net/english
[…] The New Colonialism — Greece and Ukraine by Jack Rasmus. […]
Welcome to the new world order. The re-implementation of a feudal society for southern and eastern europe. Inverted totalitarian governance under the direction of the Zionist/American/British/German led organized criminal syndicate. Along with their Canadian, Australian and northern european vassals. Prototypical nazis all. Serfdom for the masses. Those of us who still have moral compass, who possess a semblance of compassion, who hope humanity will exist beyond the next couple of decades must begin pushing back and praying that the eastern nations, Russia, China, Iran, and possibly India can succeed with their plan for dethroning the hegemon and establishing a cooperative alliance. It’s all too obvious, the Empire the Zionists and it’s vassals must go. Before they achieve their goal of exterminating the majority of humanity.
Very nice article Jack. I’d like to know what you think are the options to resist the theft of assets on the part of Greece (and other nations in the southern part of the Eurozone) and by Ukraine, vis-a-vis Russia and resistance in the eastern part.
Thanks,
Kelly
Coming form Greece I would like to offer you my view on this.
Having an external party monitoring the greek government is probably not the worst thing that could happen to Greece.It might even be a good idea.
The reason being, the greek political and administration system in general is completely and utterly corrupt.
The private sector employees like myself struggle for the basics, when the public sector employees get paid more for doing, in the majority of cases, absolutely nothing.
The inability of the greek government to achieve a better deal with the Troika, is just one more example of their inability to correct the issues the country has, which they actually make even worse by rehiring non-productive public sector employees and paying them from the money that comes from the Troika and the private sector taxes.
Greece is like an unemployed person living on benefits with absolutely no reason to get up and work.
Imagine a son having finished high school, staying at home, eating and playing video games all day, living still in the parents house, cursing them constantly cause they are bad and don’t give him enough.This is Greece right now.
The creative forces of Greece would like this situation to change, even if that means hard measures.Something needs to change fast as the situation can easily cause social problems apart from financial ones.
Thank you for reading this,
Maria
Whether or not Maria’s picture of the Greek situation is correct, she does elucidate what is evidently the view of many Greeks that “the Greek political and administration system in general is completely and utterly corrupt” – and consequently incompetent to manage a domestic currency, which is why a return to the drachma lies beyond the horizon of possibility for most Greeks. Hence, the suicidal adherence to the euro, based upon a belief that “having an external party monitoring the Greek government is probably not the worst thing that could happen to Greece.” The latter may in fact be correct. But, unfortunately, it does not follow that “monitoring” by the troika would impose the needed discipline or that the European political and administration system is any less corrupt or any more competent than the native government and administration. Granted that the corruption is different and the incompetence rooted in different principles, but the troika and the euro aim at the plunder of Greece and the reduction of the Greek population (those who do not abandon the country) to servitude – with the exception of the corrupt plunderers – as Jack Rasmus explains here and as been explained many times before by him and other honest and perceptive analysts. If Maria and her compatriots imagine that the result of this “monitoring” will be a sound, just, and efficient economy, they are fooling themselves – this is just another case of the foxes administering the hen house. The only hope for Greece is for the Greek people to rise up and demand honest and competent government, which unfortunately means not just the election of some reformist party – since we know what that comes to – but a political process that eradicates the power of entrenched elites: one or another form of true democracy.
[…] español / english […]