Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘tariffs’

Dr. Jack Rasmus, copyright 2026

“Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech was historic—but only in the sense of the longest ever at 1 hour and 47 minutes. Apart from that, the speech was one third misrepresentations about the state of the American economy followed by more than an hour of pure political theater which has come to increasingly characterize presidential SOTU addresses in recent years.

The misrepresentations of the state of the economy covered topics like inflation and cost of living, record stock market prices and asset wealth creation, his $5 trillion tax cuts almost all of which have accrued to corporations, businesses and investors, and his tariffs which have little to do with trade or economics and everything to do with raising revenue for defense spending and political intimidation of other countries.

Jobs

Treated very briefly in passing was the topic of jobs. Trump’s avoidance of the topic is understandable—given that this past year the US economy has created a total of only 181,000 jobs; i.e. barely 15,000 jobs month, a level which isn’t even sufficient to provide employment for new entrants to the labor force which ordinarily averages at least 100,000 every month.

On the topic of jobs, Trump also made no mention whatsoever of the current unemployment level. When including involuntary part time, temp, and discouraged workers, as well as full time employed, per the government’s own estimates unemployment has been averaging around 8%. That’s more than 11 million US workers jobless! Moreover, even that 8% number excludes the 10 million workers who are self-employed independent contractors which government statistics conveniently ignore by classifying them as business owners, not workers. So the actual unemployment number of unemployed is thus at least 10% when properly estimated.

Trump made passing reference to the fact that the 181,000 jobs created were 100% in the private sector—without indicating the number of course. Nor did he bother to mention that he managed to fire 27,000 federal government workers. It’s true, as he said, the US economy is at the highest employment levels ever in 2025—by 181,000 jobs of course.

Economic Growth

Another economic topic, this time completely unmentioned, was the overall real growth of the economy in 2025. Measured in Gross Domestic Product terms, GDP, the most generally accepted indicator, the US economy grew only 2.2% in all of last year! That’s down from 2.4% in 2024 before he was elected. More ominous, in the last three months of 2025 the economy slowed rapidly even more to only 1.4%. And it was actually even much slower, since the inflation adjustment used by the government, called the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) price index notoriously underestimates inflation which, in turn, boosts the reported GDP numbers. If properly inflation adjusted, actual GDP in 2025 was closer to 1% than even the reported 2.2%.

Nevertheless, Trump on several occasions bragged “we’re the hottest country in the world!”

As for future economic growth Trump continually says other countries have promised to invest $18 trillion in the US economy! But virtually all of that are just verbal pledges, mostly designed no doubt to placate Trump during negotiations over tariffs. It’s difficult to see how the Europeans, Japanese and others—all of whose economies are either in recession or stagnant—are going to invest that amount in America’s economy instead of their own.

Inflation

Trump did spend some time repeatedly claiming that inflation was reduced dramatically during his first year in office. More than once he proclaimed “inflation is plummeting”. He referenced what is called ‘core’ inflation in the PCE price index, which conveniently excludes food prices, housing costs, mortgage rates, and all other kinds of interest rates on autos, credit cards, and other loans—all of which rose last year.

And there was a big problem with the PCE price-inflation index, whether ‘core’ or what’s called ‘headline’, which includes food and energy prices.

Readers might think the PCE is constructed by the government going out and surveying a large sample of the millions of goods and services in the economy. It doesn’t. It takes a conglomeration of other surveys and estimations performed by the US Labor and Commerce Departments, puts their results together somehow, adds assumptions of its down, employs questionable methodologies, and comes up with a number that grossly underestimates actual prices in general.  And here’s a bigger problem with the PCE in 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2025 the government shut down for six of the twelve weeks in the October-December period. During that period there were no surveys done by either the Labor or Commerce departments on which the PCE could be based. So half of the quarter had no data available at all. That didn’t stop the government from making up number for the six weeks that it just plugged in the missing six weeks. It said it ‘imputed’ the data. In translation it means it just made up the numbers to smooth out the twelve weeks’ results.

The PCE is also notorious for deriving prices from non-price data. For example, it doesn’t actually ask insurance companies how much they raised their prices last year. It takes their profits (which they conveniently underestimate in order to pay lower taxes) and it ‘derives’ the industry prices from their profits! There’s scores of such questionable methods employed. And remember, no housing prices, no mortgage rate hikes, and no higher interest charges of any kind.

Trump said nothing in his speech about the huge price hikes now penetrating the economy as a result of the cuts to Medicaid and ACA subsidies. Consumers now have to absorb the huge cost increases if they want to continue prior levels of medical insurance coverage. Many won’t. But none of the loss of subsidies will be counted as price increases or be reflected in the PCE.

Stock Markets

Trump always likes to brag that the stock market is doing so great. And it is true that the three main US stock markets—the DOW, S&P 500, and Nasdaq—all hit record levels in 2025. And then they began crashing in 2026 and have all continued to trend down. Why? Because in 2025 they were almost all pumped up by speculative investing in the Artificial Intelligence bubble. In recent weeks, investors have begun getting cold feet about AI, however. The big & tech companies have been pouring hundreds of billions into developing AI but it is becoming increasingly clear to investors they may not be able to recoup the profits on the over-investing. AI is also threatening to undermine the profits of other tech, banks, transport and other companies. So their stock prices are falling as well.

The cryptocurrency markets are now in even greater freefall. The only game that is ‘hot’ is gold and silver. And their escalating rise is the result of Trump/US sanctions, tariff policy, and the devaluation of the US dollar which is now exceeding 10% so far since Trump took office. The US dollar is not doing so good but Trump said nothing about that. If it’s hot, it’s a ‘hot potato’ that other countries are dumping.

Taxation

Trump has been touting his $5 trillion 2025 tax act which his Republican run Congress quickly passed as the first measure out of the box last spring 2025.  Half of the $5 trillion wasn’t even new, however. It represented Trump’s 2018 $4.5 trillion package of tax cuts, more than half of which were for large corporations. In 2018 those tax cuts were made permanent forever and didn’t even come up for renewal in Trump’s 2025 tax package. So no net new tax stimulus from that.

What was up for renewal in 2025 were proposals for small business and individuals. The small business provisions were sweetened even more compared to 2018. So were the individual income tax cuts that benefit mostly those with incomes over $250,000 a year.

When touting his 2025 tax bill Trump likes to remind us, and he did again in his speech, that he cut taxes on tips, overtime pay, and social security. But even a brief summary of those provisions in the 2025 tax act reveal something far less. It doesn’t mean no tax on all tips. For example, a worker making $50K/yr and earning $5k on tips will get a tax deduction of only $600. The no tax on overtime pay is capped at only $12k/yr. And the so-called no tax on social security income is a big misrepresentation. It was reduced by Trump’s Congress to a tepid $6k additional tax deduction not an elimination of any tax on social security income. Moreover, all these so-called working class tax cuts phase out completely by 2028—in contrast to the corporate, business, and wealthy individual tax cuts were are now permanent forever!

Trump may be right when he calls his 2025 cuts “the largest tax cuts in history”, but it’s the largest for investors, corporations and businesses with a small token crumb thrown at American workers and all packaged in a heap of misrepresentations and outright lies.

Since 2001, by the way, presidents and Congresses of both parties have passed tax cuts totally more than $20 trillion, eighty percent of which have accrued to businesses and the wealthy.

That $20 trillion contributed significantly to the US economy’s 2025 $1.77 trillion US budget deficit and the US national debt rising from around $36.5 trillion when Trump took office to its current level just shy of $39 trillion. The other major contributions to those deficits and debt are the $9 trillion spent on wars, the Pentagon’s now $1 trillion/yr war budget, and the $1.2 trillion now paid annually to investors in US Treasury securities to pay interest on that debt. No mention of that either, of course. Or that his budget deficit in 2025 was virtually the same as Biden’s $1.8 trillion in 2024! Not a word in his speech about the out of controls annual deficits and debt. Yes, the US economy is ‘hot’, as in the barn is about to burn down hot.

Tariffs

Trump spent some time hyping his tariff policies. He bragged how his tariffs have brought in hundreds of billions of dollars of new revenues—the exact number he avoided citing since it appears, per the recent Supreme Court decision, he’ll have to give some of that back.

One would have thought he’d say something about how tariffs have reduced imports and thus reduced the USA’s annual almost $1 trillion trade deficit. But he didn’t. Why? Because the tariffs haven’t reduced that trade deficit all that much. They’re not about trade or trade deficits. The tariffs are about raising revenues for a government running $1.8 trillion budget deficits and in desperate need of new revenue sources since it’s simultaneously cutting tax revenues—and it needs to raise more funds to pay for its accelerating defense-war costs. Total US war-defense costs, not just Pentagon spending, are now running $2.1 trillion a year. And Trump says he wants to give the Pentagon, now at $1 trillion, another $400 billion for weapons in his 2027 budget. Tariffs are thus about ‘shaking down’ US allies and the rest of the world economy to generate more US government revenue to pay for tax cuts and more war spending. 

Tariffs are also a tool for intimidating foreign governments to ‘toe the line’ on US foreign policy. In that sense, they are an addition to US sanctions policies which haven’t worked all that well in that regard in recent years.

Trump’s tariff policies are all over the map. They are causing real economic strain for many US small businesses and farmers who are losing markets and revenues, as well as to some extent to consumers whose prices for goods imports are rising.

It is true that Trump has raised the average rate of tariffs on imports to the US from a previous 2.4% to around 13%. And those who think legislation or the Supreme Court will prevent him from raising them further are naively mistaken. His vision is tariffs are the economic panacea for all that ails the US economy. As he put it at one point, obviously departing from his prepared speech, he wants tariffs to someday even replace the individual income tax!

That will mean a regressive de facto sales tax on goods imports of at least 30%. At that level, domestic US producers will have sufficient cover to raise prices on US produced goods by at least 10% on average. Double digit chronic inflation anyone?

These were the main economic measures Trump addressed. When considered in more detail, Trump’s touting of the US economy’s performance in 2025 amounts to misrepresentation at best, and outright lies in most cases. 

The US economy is not robustly growing but slowing. Jobs are barely being created. Inflation is nearly twice that reported by the PCE index, which is over-inflating US GDP in turn. The stock market bubbles of 2025 have begun unwinding, the AI hype has peaked, and the US dollar devaluation is accelerating and the worse since the 1970s. The US budget deficits and national debt continue surging out of control and interest payments to rich holders of US Treasury securities are escalating past $1.2 trillion a year! The tax cuts of 2025, like those of 2018, will provide little if any real stimulus to the economy and the working class cuts are a sham of what’s claimed. Pledges by other countries to invest in the US aren’t worth the verbal assurances given or the paper they’re written on, if in fact they were written. Tariffs are about raising revenue and political intimidation of allies and the rest of the world alike. They are a reflection of the fact the US empire is running short of funds and is searching for radical funding alternatives in lieu of economic growth or debt financing now approaching its limits. Tariffs in turn are upending global supply chains and global trade and will lead to other countries’ turning further away from the US dollar, thus ensuring its further devaluation.

In short, the Trump economy and the USA is ‘hot’ only in the sense it is becoming domestically, and globally, an internal combustion engine heating up as result of insufficient coolant. And when engines become so ‘hot’, their mechanical working parts eventually just freeze up.

Go to top

About the Author

Jack Rasmus is author of the recently published book, ‘The Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy from Reagan to Trump’, Clarity Press, 2020. He publishes at Predicting the Global Economic Crisis

Read Full Post »

This past week was punctuated by a perfect storm of negative US economic reports and events. Together they mean the door to recession in the US has now opened—quite contrary to all of Trump’s hype that the US economy is doing great.

The reports in question are the July jobs report lasts Friday and the advanced (preliminary) US GDP report for the 2nd quarter (April-June) released a few days before. The events associated with these reports were (1)Trump’s announcement imposing widespread tariff hikes ranging from 15% to 41% on more than 40 countries, with even higher tariffs previously announced on China, Russia, Mexico, Canada as well as ‘across the board’ global tariffs steel, aluminum, copper and other commodities; (2) and The Federal Reserve bank’s decision to keep US interest rates at current levels for at least another six weeks.

If last week’s 2nd quarter GDP data unlocked the door to recession, then last Friday’s Jobs data kicked it wide open. And Trump’s tariffs coming behind threaten to blow it off its hinges.

The Jobs Data Tsunami

It’s generally acknowledged that jobs are a lagging indicator of the condition of the US economy. If so, the July Jobs report shows that there’s no more lag. Jobs have caught up and Friday’s August 1, 2025 report shows Labor Market conditions in the US economy are now flashing red.

According to the US Labor Department’s Establishment Survey (CES) only 73,000 net new jobs were created in July. Moreover, this number is likely to be downward revised, since the July jobs report also revised its previous May and June reports downward big time: for May, the jobs created were reduced from an initially reported 144,000 jobs created that month to only 19,000 in fact: for June, the revision was from 147,000 to 14,000. So when July is similarly revised, it’s highly likely the 73,000 will be reduced dramatically as well. This will mean the total jobs created over the past three months will be barely 50,000!

It’s generally acknowledged the economy has 125,000 new workers entering the labor force and economy every month. The economy must therefore create that many jobs every month just to absorb new entrants, mostly youths seeking jobs for the first time. Only 50,000 created means more than 300,000 are entering the ranks of the unemployed not gainful employment.

The US Labor Department has a second jobs survey to the CES, which covers mostly large companies. The second survey is called the Current Population Survey or CPS. It covers more small and medium sized businesses as well as unemployment levels the CES does not report. The CPS report on Friday showed that new entrants’ unemployment rise by 275,000 in July.

The plight of new workers seeking employment is not the only negative indicator of a rapidly deteriorating US labor market this summer. Here’s some other telling job indicators:

  • The general level of employment in July fell by -260,000. It would have been an even greater decline had the level of part time employment not also risen by 433,000 as well. No doubt many companies converted their full time employed workers to part time in lieu of laying them off. Conversion of full time to part time typically occurs with the onset of early stages of recession.
  • Beyond just July, the CPS revealed that since May 1 the Employment level for the US economy in general declined by -863,000.
  • The unemployment rate, also indicated by the CPS only, remains at approximately 8% for the entire US labor force of 170 million—not the ‘official unemployment rate of 4.2% one consistently reported by the mainstream media and hyped by politicians. The 8% includes the 50 million plus part time, temp, discouraged, independent contractor, gig and similar job categories that the ‘official’ 4.2% excludes.
  • The 8% means there’s roughly 14 million US workers unemployed or underemployed. Of that 14 million, those unemployed long term (more than 27 weeks) has risen sharply as well over the summer. In July alone their numbers rose by 179,000.

Multiple statistics show the band-aid has been ripped off the obfuscation of the real condition of the labor market that has prevailed for at least this past year, exposing the long festering wound beneath.

The labor market has been weak for some time, as this writer has been reporting repeatedly over the past year. One needed only to look behind the mainstream media’s cherry picked reporting of the most favorable numbers in the two jobs reports, ignoring other data in the same reports that were growing consistently weaker.

What’s different the past three months, and in the July report in particular, is that the real rot in the jobs market could no longer be covered up by selective media reporting or by politicians’ hype.

Trump’s response to the recent jobs data has been to shoot the messenger, as he quickly announced his firing of the Labor Department’s statistics chief. But there’s no politically ‘cooked numbers’ to make him look bad here, as Trump claims. It’s just that the facts have now deteriorated to such an extent that even efforts to pave over the pot holes with marginal under-reporting and selective media reporting can no longer cover up the true condition of the deteriorating jobs ‘road-bed’.

The US GDP April-June Report

The second report indicating the US economy now balances on the precipice of recession is the advance (preliminary) US GDP report for the 2nd Quarter 2025. Here’s just three reasons why the announced 3% growth rate is not actually 3%.

First, readers should understand the US, virtually alone among advanced economies, puffs up its quarterly GDP numbers by multiplying the quarter change from the previous quarter by annualizing it. That is, 3% for the 2nd quarter is actually 4 times roughly what the economy actually grew from the previous 1st quarter.  3% sounds a lot better than 0.75% if one is publicly hyping the growth rate in the media.

However, even the 3%(0.75%) is grossly over-estimated for several reasons. Here’s just two of many: First, real GDP is artificially boosted by under-estimating the real rate of inflation. This occurs every report. Second, in the case of the 2nd quarter GDP report, the 3% is grossly over-estimated by temporary effects due to Trump’s current tariffs policies now rolling out which has dramatically distorted the contribution to GDP from what is called ‘net exports’—i.e. the difference and gap between imports into the US and US exports to the rest of the world.  For decades, imports have significantly exceeded exports. The result is that ‘net exports’, as the gap is called, has been a consistent subtraction from GDP from other categories like consumer spending, business investment, and government spending.

Let’s look at the under-reporting of real GDP due to low-balling inflation, and then the volatile impact of Trump’s tariffs on GDP for the entire first half of 2025.

(How Under-Estimating Inflation Over-Estimates GDP)

When the government reports GDP it’s for what’s called ‘real’ GDP. Real means adjusted for inflation (unadjusted is called ‘nominal’ GDP). The media reports the ‘real’. For the 2nd quarter that was the 3%. The problem is the inflation adjustment used greatly understates actual inflation. And the more it underestimates actual inflation, the more in turn real GDP is over-estimated.

The price index used to estimate real GDP is called the PCE. For the 2nd quarter the PCE was 2.1%. In the first quarter it was higher, at 3.7%. So simply by reducing PCE from 3.7% to 2.1%, all things equal the real GDP of 3% was boosted by a 1.6% lower PCE in the 2nd quarter.  If PCE in the 2nd quarter was 3.7% as in the 1st quarter, then 2nd quarter real GDP would be 1.4% instead of the reported 3%.

Ok. Some will argue perhaps inflation did abate significantly in the 2nd quarter compared to the first. Perhaps inflation was indeed 40%+ less in the 2nd compared to the 1st. But whichever the quarter PCE grossly underestimates actual inflation for dozens of reasons due to faulty assumptions and questionable methodologies used by the government to get PCE. Don’t think the government actually goes out and surveys price changes by businesses to get the PCE, like it does the other price index called the Consumer Price Index. It doesn’t. PCE is determined totally by estimating prices from other sources than the actual prices charged by businesses.

For example, let’s take insurance costs for home, auto, etc. which have been surging the past year. Insurance prices aren’t surveyed. They are extrapolated from insurance company profits. If the big insurance companies hide their profits in order to pay less taxes—which they do—then insurance inflation is grossly underestimated. But that’s what happens with PCE. How about rent inflation. Rents in the PCE index are calculated from reported new rental contracts from a subset of big apartment owners. Landlord price hikes for renters with existing contracts do not report price hikes within the term of the rental contract. There are dozens such examples that result in PCE underestimating actual inflation. Nonethless, PCE is used to low ball actual inflation in order in turn to over-estimate reported ‘real’ GDP. In short, 3% GDP in 2nd quarter is not actual GDP because PCE inflation is not actual inflation.

There are many other ways GDP in general is always over-estimated, apart from the faulty inflation adjustment. There are issues with seasonality adjustment methodologies. There are issues with how GDP is periodically re-defined in order to make it look larger. The latest such example was in 2013 when the government included as business investment items like business logos, trademarks, R&D expenses, IP and other similarly un-estimable values. The government simply accepts whatever businesses tell it are the increase in value (and thus price) of these ephemeral items, and then adds them to GDP.  When first introduced more than a decade ago, this boosted real GDP from business investment by more than $500 billion a year. Thus real business investment and its contribution to GDP is, and has been, less than reported every year.

Trump Tariffs & Volatile Net Exports

The even bigger reason why the 2nd quarter GDP growth of 3% is misrepresented has to do with Trump’s recent tariffs and trade policies. Briefly stated: nearly all of the 2nd quarter 3% GDP growth was due to the collapse of imports to the US economy in the quarter in response to Trump’s tariffs.

In the 1st quarter 2025, companies increased their imports excessively in anticipation of Trump’s coming tariffs. That artificially exacerbated the gap between exports from the US and imports to the US. A big negative number resulted, as imports exceeded exports by a wide margin. Imports thus subtracted from overall GDP calculation in the 1st quarter, overwhelming the effect on GDP from government spending, consumption, and business investment. GDP thus contracted by -0.5% in the first quarter. Virtually all due to the effect of import surge.

This flipped in the 2nd quarter. Imports that formerly surged in the 1st quarter collapsed in the 2nd. The difference between imports and exports now added to GDP. How much? Around 5% or 2% more than the actual 3% GDP. So what subtracted from the 5% to get the 3%? Business investment contracted, government spending flattened to virtually zero and consumption slowed. That knocked 2% off the 5% from imports-exports to get to the 3%.

Considering both quarters, it’s clear tariff policy and its impact on exports and imports, especially the latter, is distorting the numbers for GDP in the first half of the year 2025.

But beneath this what’s happening is business investment, a more permanent and less volatile factor in GDP determination, is steadily falling. In part due to tariff and trade volatility but also due to more fundamental forces and developments within the US economy. The same can be said for consumer spending, now steadily slowing even if still growing. In addition, Trump fiscal policies—spending cuts for social programs, government employment, and department dismantling are also building pressure toward less government GDP contribution.

US Economy Next 6-12 Months

The US economy is now at the precipice of recession and will likely deteriorate further over the next 6 to 12 months, and especially so in 2026. Here’s why:

Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ Act just passed by the Congress will have a net negative impact on GDP, and will not boost US economic growth as Trump claims.

Most of the at least $3 trillion in corporate and individual (and estate) tax cuts are just a continuation of previous 2018 cuts. The effect of the 2025 bill is just to make them permanent. That’s not net new fiscal stimulus from tax cutting. Meanwhile, the so-called working class $500 billion tax cuts in the bill—for tips, overtime pay, social security, interest on new cars, etc.—have been dramatically reduced and made temporary.

In contrast, the program and employment spending cuts in the bill—for Medicaid, ACA subsidies, education, layoffs of federal workers, and so on—amount to at least $1.5 trillion and take effect immediately. They will significantly reduce current consumer spending this year and next. Furthermore, Trump’s cuts in spending and layoffs will soon begin to spill over to state and local government spending cuts and layoffs, as the states will have to make up for reduced Federal government support and find ways to continue education, health and other spending from their own budgets. They too will have to begin layoffs and cuts to programs, both of which will exacerbate consumer spending in their states.

Add to all this what economists call the ‘multiplier effects’. Tax cut multiplier effects are less than spending cuts multiplier effects. Tax cuts don’t immediately result in more investment by businesses or wealthy investors. They lag. Moreover, the more the cuts accrue to the more wealthy and corporations, the less is actually spent of the total cuts. Some of the cuts are just hoarded. Some are distributed to shareholders as stock buybacks and dividend payouts. Some are invested in financial asset markets, none of which add to GDP. And some are redirected to offshore investment which also contributes nothing to US GDP. So tax multiplier positive effects are relatively low, and increasingly so in the 21st century as the US economy has globalized and financialized.

In contrast, the multiplier negative effects from spending on programs and jobs are immediate and much higher. This is especially more so, to the extent the spending cuts negatively impact incomes of middle to low income levels, which the Trump spending cuts clearly target. In other words, the composition of the Trump tax and spending cuts are net negative and exacerbate the negative multiplier effects of the combined tax and spending cuts as well.

In summary, over the next year US GDP is likely to weaken due to less consumer spending—as state and local government layoffs rise and Trump spending cuts take effect as well as due to less immediate and historically low impacts of tax cuts on the real economy—while the short term positive effect on Imports-Exports on 2nd quarter GDP dissipates.

The recent Jobs and GDP reports reveal the door to near term recession has opened. Trump tariff, tax and spending policies will likely kick it wide open as they take effect.

Jack Rasmus

Read Full Post »