In addition to my lengthy article and Introduction to my forthcoming book, ‘The Twilight of American Imperialism’, in the post immediately preceding, listen to my May 30 Alternative Visions show presentation on the theme at the following podcast:
https://alternativevisions.podbean.com/e/alternative-visions-is-the-us-empire-about-to-collapse/
Dr. Jack Rasmus @drjackrasmus









The sweeping economic description of empire through millennia was appreciated.
However, I perceive a major gap in the economic history of the US in the forthcoming book—specifically the US civil war. Although it had a genuine populist cover—-ending slavery—-and 750,000 soldiers died in the struggle,* fundamentally the real role that the US civil war played was to jump start capitalism in the US, that is to change it from a primarily agricultural country with thousands of small independent farmers into an industrial giant with landless workers. So in effect, all that happened to the lower 90% is that they traded chattel slavery for wage slavery although a peculiarly vicious form of chattel slavery was reserved for African Americans stranded in the South: debt slavery. Hundreds of thousands of African Americans were first wrongly incarcerated for bogus debts and then worked to death by such Fortune 500 companies as US Steel; ultimately their bodies were thrown into mass anonymous graves. [See e.g. Slavery by Another Name] To this day I am livid that the self appointed literary elites heaped lavished praise on Solzhenitsyn and ignored the much larger US Gulag right under their lazy noses.
*To give the US civil war death toll current context, the death toll would be in present population numbers about 1.5 million
A good point David. I will of course address the civil war. The draft Intro was amiss in not saying so. I see the civil war as the conflict needed for the empire to ‘clear the deck’ and complete its continental expansion. The war conclusively ended the contest between the various ‘modes of production’ in north america: the slave mode in the south; the hunter-gatherers mode in the Indian lands; and eventually (last) the Jeffersonian yeoman farmer producing mostly for subsistence and not for the global market. The capitalist mode defeated them all and wiped the land clean for capitalist expansion leap beyond the continent in the US-Spanish war of 1898. The 20th century is all about US capitalist entry, competition and eventual conquest of other capitalist (and pre-capitalist) empires, which was completed by 1945 in part and by 1990-92 with the collapse of the USSR. 1992 to present is US empire running amuck, expanding economically, militarily and technologically at the expense of all would be challengers and countries seeking to break away and become independent. However, the world has changed, beginning in 2008-10 and now accelerating 2022-25. Instead of expanding, which peaked around 2005-07, the empire has failed in a number of attempts to keep expanding and no longer has the economic, technological or military dominance it previously had. How this plays out over the next decade 2025-35 will determine the fate of the empire. Empires experience crises and overcome them sometimes. Sometimes they don’t, however. I disagree with those on the left that the empire is collapsing (Hudson, Wolff). There’s too much wishful thinking in their analysis and they underestimate the material resources the empire still has. I learned decades ago as a local union president, negotiator and strike leader never to underestimate your opponent. In fact, better to over-estimate when considering strategy and tactics. And always plan to have at least three responses in your pocket to every possible move your opponent will likely make. Of course, thinking ahead like that is not what US politicians today tend to do. The empire had much smarter leaders in previous decades. Since Bill Clinton, a crass opportunist, it’s been downhill in the quality of leadership. Just think about it: Jr. Bush (who let Cheney run the show), Barack Obama (a poverty pimp black intellectual picked by the capitalists for his dominant character of ‘go along to get along’), volatile and impulsive Trump, and that empty suit turned demented fool, Joe Biden.