Want to know some of the questionable methods & assumptions that go into US official job and inflation statistics? Listen to my September 8 Alternative Visions radio show.
GO TO:
https://alternativevisions.podbean.com/e/alternative-visions-how-reliable-is-us-economic-data/
Dr. Jack Rasmus @drjackrasmus









The 60/40 split among the Fortune 500 as to reporting economic data suggests that the 60% who do not report could care less whether or not there is high underemployment and inflation: they agree with Keynes who established long ago that an economy can bump along the bottom indefinitely regardless of the cost to what we now call the lower 90%. But the WSJ authors represent the 40% who are concerned about continuing interest rate hikes and thus question the fundamental basis of those hikes by the Fed: the economic statistics that the Fed relies upon are so politicized as to be almost meaningless.
Yes, distorted by political influence but I would add distorted also by the deep changes in the US product, labor, and financial markets caused by the unnecessary severe Covid era shutdowns, the impact of which will be felt for years. BLS and Commerce Dept. stats tend to lag to changes in the real economy but lag even more now. Plus the trend in govt stats has been for years to create ‘smoothing’ methodologies that dampen both inflation and unemployment (and in doing so boost real GDP estimates). US inflation as households know is running at least 5-6% per the CPI. But Govt uses the far more conservative GDP deflator index (around 2-3%) to adjust inflation to get real GDP. That yields a 2-3% reported real GDP, when it actually may be negative. Also, GDP was ‘redefined’ in 2013 to add new costs and questionable items (value of Company trademarks, logos, etc.) to add $500B to investment contribution to GDP, which has risen further since 2013. Thus, just the inflation adjustment methodology and the redefinition of what constitutes real investment’s contribution to business spending are two means by which GDP is grossly overestimated in quarterly reports. The mainstream media keeps hyping retail sales growth of 6% (and its boost to consumption), but that’s not adjusted for inflation. If using the CPI, real retail sales is flat; in turn consumption contribution to GDP is also much lower. Add that to the questionable redefinitions of business investment and US GDP is more likely flat at best in 2023. Then realize that it declined YoY in 2021 and rose only 1% in 2022–and all that after an $8 trillion fiscal and monetary stimulus occurred in 2020-21. Yet they tell us (Biden’s tour underway) that the US economy is doing so great. And mainstream economists like Krugman scratch their heads and wonder why the average American can’t see this obvious recovery. Maybe they can, and Krugman can’t because he’s blinded by the statistical distortions being reported